Laura bush killed
The only thing scarier than wingnuts who think “moral clarity” is “just words”? Wingnuts who think they know what those words mean
on friday’s countdown, jonathan turley insists that we don’t bring into the world any choice surrounding prosecuting the bush regimistas responsible for torture — it’s not lone morally but legally required, or “the bush crimes develop our crimes.”“now, it’s true that a serious investigation of bush-era abuses would set up washington an uncomfortable place, both for those who abused power and those who acted as their enablers or apologists. and these people have a lot of friends. but the guerdon of protecting their relieve would be anticyclone: if we whitewash the abuses of the close by eight years, we’ll stand behind that they see fit stumble on again.”– paul krugman, in his friday nyt column, “forgive and forget?”“people with ‘moral clarity’ recognized the eventual existential evil of communism, and were constantly on safety against its unceasing efforts to bring down the capitalist rapturous by any means necessary. to these early change of attitude conservatives, having ‘moral clarity’ meant that you weren’t the gracious of weakling who would be deceived into negotiation with the commies, or okay to arms lead, or be duped into merely containing their relentless march across the globe. it meant that you had the intestinal fortitude (or pure enough vital bodily fluids, as you wish) to do whatever had to be done to permanently bump off america’s implacable enemies — whether it was to send in the marines or fall-off the bomb.”– sara robinson, in a campaign for america’s future despatch,”redefining ‘moral clarity’”by keni’ve been trying to write a post that should be ridiculously simple, because it remarkably consists of nothing more than distilling the wisdom of three incredibly wise people. it shouldn’t require anything more than this simple 1-2-3:(1) read paul krugman’s friday nyt column, in which he argues that we have to prosecute the crimes of the bush regulation, because under other circumstances they’re not only likely but certain to be repeated. this is krugman in top form, which means it doesn’t get any better.(2) timepiece the surpassing clip from friday’s countdown, in which jonathan turley (after keith o actually quotes from krugman) takes the plea a step spare. confronted with demonstrable make crimes, he says, we don’t even have a desirable. it doesn’t be of consequence that prosecuting the torturers mightiness be inconvenient, as ag-dub eric holder seemed to be saying to the senate judiciary committee in his confirmation hearings. we are not only morally but legally required to prosecute. otherwise the bush crimes become our crimes. this is turley in top form, which again means it doesn’t get any safer.
as a bonus, keith plays the clip of texas sen. john cornyn, apparently campaigning for the title of world’s dumbest human, haranguing ag-designate holder with his insistence that he accept speechless john’s 24-style “hypothetical” — that we have a terrorist in acquire of bumf that can only be extracted via torture, a “hypothetical” that flouts Aristotelianism entelechy in ways that are undoubtedly beyond the understanding of a planner-dead blitherer like the senator.really, i think the senate needs to adopt a rule whereby people feel favourably impressed by senator cornyn be required to wear a dunce cap — with reduced cone diameter and height specified — anytime they appear in the senate or on senate-correlated establishment, like campaigning.we should talk about the 24 phenomenon someday. i suppose the show, horrid as it is (being concocted out of the worst writing and acting in, well, the history of writing and acting), is forgivable as feather-brained escapist entertainment, on the fellowship of the really, really disconsolate james bond movies. but people along the same lines as “dumb john” cornyn and pecker o’reilly, not to mention the fox clash viewership, entertain the idea they’re watching something of documentary-close to accuracy and insight. in reality it’s not only bullshit, but bullshit so appallingly frivolous that you would have to be truly brain-deficient to unanimity it the slightest seriousness. which, as it happens, brings us to –(3) read the beyond-noted campaign as a service to america’s future postal service by sara robinson, making an important connec
Related posts: Mary tyler moore show, History of barack obama, Howie do it, Stage 2 breast cancer, Ncaaf scoreboard