RIAA threatens Prof. Nesson with Rule 11 sanctions, then opposes motion to compel Matthew Oppenheim deposition in SONY BMG Music v. Tenenbaum
In SONY BMG Music v. Tenenbaum, the RIAA has filed its papers opposing the defendant’s motion to compel the deposition of Matthew J. Oppenheim and requested that the Court award monetary sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37.Attached to the papers is a January 21, 2009, letter in which Timothy M. Reynolds threatened Prof. Nesson with Rule 11 or Rule 37 sanctions.Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant’s Motion to Compel Deposition of Matthew J. OppenheimExhibit A — January 21, 2009, Letter of Timothy M. Reynolds Threatening Rule 11 SanctionsKeywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player
Related posts: Seems like old times, Cliff notes, Sons of anarchy season 2, Shower posse, Ben stiller movies
0 responses so far ↓
There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.
You must log in to post a comment.