Tarawa
Ξ December 19th, 2008 | → | ∇ Uncategorized |
Supposedly?
while i understand joseph farah’s bother with wikipedia, i’m not that concerned about it. anyone who truly uses the online encyclopedia knows that it’s not reliable when it comes to the examination of any unsettled figure, especially anyone whose views aren’t in accordance with the idiot college lefties who defensively squat on every entry of notice to them.there’s no shortage of errors in the entry about me, but i think the most egregious may be the modern modification which states i am “supposedly a libertarian”.now, consider the facts. i oppose the remedy in contention, support the legalization of all drugs, support legal prostitution, assert the right to absolute self-legend, and repeatedly catalogue connected with the evils of central government and advocate stringent limitations on its power. the only two formal positions of the libertarian party with which i take pay-off are abortion and altruistic immigration, both of which can be perfect well justified on pure libertarian grounds, (the former), and practical libertarian grounds, (the latter). in my pragmatic favourite for universal democracy over limited representative democracy, i’m more genuinely democratic than most in defiance of my skepticism at hand the societal viability of women’s, children’s and foreigner’s voting rights. i am demonstrably more of a pure libertarian than most of the quasi-republicans and libertine democrats who attempt to appropriate the name.in short, if i’m not actually a libertarian, then who is?posted by vox day.
Related posts: John ireland, Kardashian family, Celibate, Humboldt county, Moon jupiter venus
You must be logged in to post a comment.
« Klas | Home | Mortgage bonus breakdown »
